Friday, August 03, 2007

All roads (well, two) lead to Austin

I got the official announcement this week that my agent and my S.V.T. editor will both be at the next big Austin SCBWI conference. And though it's not until April 26, 2008, I'm already plenty excited. This will be only my second in-person get-together with my agent, and the first time to meet my editor.

You New York authors, with your New York agents and your New York editors -- do you realize how lucky you are?

Labels: , ,

Saturday, July 14, 2007

Three is a magic number

In my first 75 months of writing for children, I made one sale (The Day-Glo Brothers). In the past five months, my agent has made three on my behalf -- S.V.T., my Alan Lomax biography, and now Pasta.

This third sale, to Dial, was announced just yesterday, and we're describing this Y.A. project as a "collection of profiles of real-life impostors ranging from charlatans to survivors." Since it doesn't yet have an official title, or much else -- we sold this one based on a proposal and two sample chapters -- Pasta gets to keep its code name. (Get it? Impostor, pasta -- I guess it helps to imagine a New England accent.)

These past few months have been thrilling and bewildering, rewarding and discombobulating. After more than six years of always actively trying to sell what I've written, I'm in the unfamiliar position of having enough work lined up to keep me busy for the next couple of years. I like the security and stability of the situation, but I hope I'll still have the flexibility to jump onto some new project temporarily should inspiration come from an unexpected place.

But that's just me overthinking things. For now, I'll close with this quote from my limbic brain:

"Woo-hoo!"

Labels: ,

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

And speaking of things that can take a long time...

It's not just researching and writing.

Yesterday, I received an editor's response to the last outstanding manuscript submission predating my (ultimately successful) attempt to find an agent.

It was a rejection.

Labels:

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Coming sometime from Little, Brown: S.V.T. By me!

Breaking news: I've just sold my second book!

Little, Brown is going to publish the thoroughly silly, not-at-all-nonfictional, just-something-I-made-up picture book that I've been referring to here as "S.V.T." And in fact, because the book is so concept-driven, and because the actual title gives so much of that concept away, and because I'm just plain paranoid, I'm going to continue to refer to it by its acronym.

But if you're the first person to guess what "S.V.T." stands for, not only will I not stamp my feet until I go through a hole in the floor, I'll give you a free copy of the book -- you know, in a few years.

This has been a thrilling few weeks watching this deal come together, and I'm just as happy as can be. It was fascinating to watch my agent do her thing, and it just about killed me not to spill the partially cooked beans here on Bartography. I could go on and on about this whole experience -- as you already know if you're my wife, kids, agent, or mother -- but I have no idea where to start (or stop).

Many thanks to my family for their inspiration and enthusiasm, to Don, Julie and Gregory K. for reading an early draft of S.V.T., and to Agent E for finding such an exciting home for this manuscript. Wheeee!

Labels: ,

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Get hep to Farm School

A couple of weeks ago I solicited suggestions for additional books connecting American music to American history.

Well, just look at what Becky at Farm School came up with. Thanks, Becky!

Labels: ,

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Kelly and Jennifer and Liz and Janette and...

Real quickly-like this Sunday morning...

First off, welcome to those of you visiting via the 10th Carnival of Children's Literature at Big A little a. Thanks for sending them this way, Kelly!

Those of you in Houston: Author and Cybils judge Jennifer Armstrong will be down from New York next Monday reading and signing The American Story at Blue Willow Bookshop. If you attend, be sure to ask for the story of the molasses flood.

With the recentish debut of Liz In Ink, my friend Liz Garton Scanlon has joined the ranks of Austin children's writers who blog (ACWWB). This past week, I've enjoyed reading about her enthusiasm for her new research project and her poetic take on the super colossal ice storm that shut down this town.

Also relatively new to the kidlitosphere is Janette Rallison, with whom I share an agent So, what does that make us? Fellow clients? Sibling clients? Agentmates? POSSLA? At any rate, welcome, Janette.

Speaking of our co-/mutual/shared/common agent, those of you in SCBWI (and logged in to scbwi.org) can now read the transcript of the chat she participated in last month. Potentially great news for folks in Austin: She's tentatively scheduled to come to the conference this fall. It's never too soon to start thinking of ways to get on her good side.

Labels:

Friday, October 27, 2006

Well, here's something I'd hoped wouldn't happen

Yesterday morning, an acquaintance told me about a concept for a picture book that sounded so perfect, it's amazing that someone else hasn't already thought of it.

Funny I should think that when I did.

This sort of implausibly unclaimed idea comes along from time to time, and one of them came to me a few years ago. When I thought up the title and concept for P.O., (a.k.a. "the bomb," for you longtime Bartographiles), I immediately checked into whether they'd already been done. Astonishingly, they hadn't, so I started writing and ended up with three complete picture book manuscripts and partial takes on two more stories, all involving the same characters.

Then came yesterday afternoon's news from my agent. She'd submitted P.O. to an editor at a major house, and something about the title rang a bell with this editor. Could that be because another editor at the same house had recently been showing around an illustrator's project with the same title and concept?

Yes, indeed.

It makes me a little queasy to think about, so I'm not going to think about it. It's just that simple.

Not thinking about it.

Still not thinking about it.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, August 08, 2006

No writer left behind

Any progress I make as a writer in the next week or two, I feel I will owe to No Child Left Behind.

I suppose I should explain.

A literary agent of my acquaintance was ruminating recently on the poor sales prospects for simply told, old-fashioned children's nonfiction and historical fiction:
I called one editor who is passionate about historical fiction to talk with her about it, and she said it's due to No Child Left Behind and the standardized testing that has become prevalent in American schools. For a couple of decades, the whole language movement has dominated, and teachers at all age levels have used trade books--picture books, chapter books, and fiction--to expand and underscore the lessons they teach in all areas, not just for reading classes or library time. The way standardized testing has come to dominate the educational landscape has caused the pendulum to swing away from the whole language approach, and now teachers are relying, again and unfortunately, primarily on textbooks, which better prepare students for those multiple-choice questions, supposedly. Even institutional publishers who specialize in the school and library market are finding they cannot do historical fiction and other nonfiction subjects terribly successfully outside of textbook form, and so naturally, trade houses are also pulling away from nonfiction, history, and biography--unless they are such strong stories that they would be successful whether they were truth or fiction, and the truth-behind-the-story aspect becomes just a bonus, rather than the point. [emphasis mine]
I tend to write nonfiction in a pretty straightforward form and with a pretty straightforward voice. I would be hard-pressed to describe that voice, other than to say that it sounds an awful lot like the way I talk.

But once I read this theory about the impact of NCLB, I realized that I've been undercutting myself by not paying anywhere near as much attention to voice and form as I do to the facts and themes of the lives I write about. And I immediately resolved to do something about it -- in some unspecified project at some point in the maybe not-so-distant future.

Just a couple of days later, I was talking with my wife about all this when I two-thirds-jokingly suggested an off-the-beaten path approach I might take to Pasta. To my surprise, the idea rang in my ears like I'd struck a tuning fork -- it felt just perfect for the stories I'll be telling in this project. The next morning, it still did, and a few days later -- now that I've actually begun writing -- it still does.

So there you have it: Whatever else one can say about NCLB, it has jolted me out of my narrative rut. And I don't even have to take a standardized test to prove it.

Labels: ,

Thursday, April 13, 2006

How to make my day

A nonfiction author I hadn't met before e-mailed me the other day with a few questions about my agent. In closing, she wished me well with my book and said, "It had never even occurred to me that someone invented Day-Glo!"

Yes, yes, YES!!! That's exactly how I want folks to respond when they hear about The Day-Glo Brothers.

Labels: ,

Thursday, March 02, 2006

Mr. Smith gets back into circulation

Word came from Agent Erin this week that my latest revision of Smith did the trick, so this middle-grade biography is ready to make the rounds among editors. This will be the first manuscript that we've sent out as a pair to an editor I wasn't already working with, and I'm excited to see how the process works.

The one last thing I needed to do was put together my bibliography for Smith, which I took care of late last night. So, now I think I'll reward myself with a little break.

...

Well, that was nice.

This morning I was up at my usual 5 a.m., sending out interview requests for the proposal I'm working on for E.F., which would be for young adults. Meanwhile, I'm waiting on a bunch of library books to help me get started researching another YA project I'd like to propose (it's so new, I don't have a pseudonym for it yet), and I also need to completely rewrite some sample text for Holiday, another picture book biography I want to pitch.

Good thing I'll be fortifying myself today with some BBQ.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, January 24, 2006

Connections at ALA

Don Tate and I drove down to San Antonio early Saturday morning for the ALA Midwinter Meeting. Before we'd even made it inside the Gonzalez Center, I knew I was in the right place and in good company.

From sometime back, Don knows Colleen Salley, and we passed her on the way inside. He introduced me to her, and she introduced us to her editor at Harcourt, Jeannette Larson. Or, as I like to think of her, children's literature's other Jeannette Larson – the first being Jeanette ("One 'N'") Larson, youth services manager of the Austin Public Library, godmother of the local scene and beyond.

Inside, I almost immediately found and hugged Austin ex-pat Annette Simon at the Simply Read booth. I happily walked away with a signed copy of Mocking Birdies, which matches the birdhouse Annette designed with draft versions of her artwork for the book, and which I bought at an SCBWI auction over a year ago.

Then I went to work, getting my money's worth for the $25 it cost to get onto the exhibit floor. Amid the children's publishers' booths – most of them so close together that it felt like the greatest small-town downtown on the planet – I began seeking out editors. Some of them I'd met at prior events, some I'd submitted to in the past, and some didn't know me from the Elvis impersonator prowling the show floor.

While I was talking with Simon & Schuster's Paula Wiseman (editor of Buddy by Austin's Anne Bustard), we were approached by a redhead who I recognized only from a photo.

"Are you my agent?" I asked in my best picture-book-about-a-baby-bird-who’s-confused-about-which-animal-is-his-mother voice (which probably wasn’t all that good).

She was. I’d been awake since before 4 that morning, largely out of excitement about finally getting to meet Erin Murphy in person. And here she stood. I felt immediately comfortable with her.

We strolled amid the booths for a while and then sat and plotted upcoming submissions. We had lunch with a couple of Erin's other Texas clients: sister nonfictioner Dani Sneed and the irrepressible novelist/puppeteer Diane Roberts. Diane would tell you that I picked up her napkin 27 times during our meal, but really, it was only four.

After lunch, it was more editors, more ARCs, more F&Gs. I haven’t counted, but I came away with roughly three dozen books and maybe a couple dozen new or strengthened editorial contacts. I also go to meet Liz from A Chair, A Fireplace and A Tea Cozy, making a connection that wouldn’t have been open to us a year ago, in that dark time before either of us had a blog. Upon learning that this was her first-ever trip to Texas, I shot a cactus so as to impress her.

Having not gotten my fill of Diane during lunch, Don and I joined her and her self-published traveling companion Linda Ayers for dinner. I’m typically an introvert, but put me in the vicinity of others who love children’s literature, and it turns me inside out – or, perhaps, right side out. After dinner we called it a night, but my mind – spinning from all the contact and the conversation, powered by all the caffeine – kept me up a lot later than it should have.

Calling Sunday morning “more of the same” doesn’t really do it justice, but it’s accurate. The day’s big event was lunch with Charlesbridge editor Judy O’Malley. It was my third time to meet Judy, so I’m very at ease with her – too at ease, one could argue.

At the end of lunch my cell phone began to vibrate. Now, I’m a cell phone novice, with a crummy phone and a crummy plan that typically keeps my calls to a minimum. But not at ALA.

I glanced down to see who was calling. “Excuse me,” I said to Judy in a semi-smarmy Hollywood voice. “It’s my agent.”

Well, Judy – knowing Erin, and knowing that I had just signed with her, and having referred me to her in the first place – found this hilarious. But I immediately hated the way it felt and swore never to do such a thing ever again. It did, however, help set up the best possible conclusion to my ALA experience.

Erin met us back at the Charlesbridge booth, and while she and Judy caught up, I ventured down the aisle to the Chronicle booth, where my friend and encourager Dianna Aston signed me a copy of her beautiful new book An Egg Is Quiet. Moments later, here comes Don with Varian Johnson. I got to introduce Don and Varian to Judy and Erin, and while I was at it, I introduced Erin to Dianna.

Connection after connection after connection. When I first stumbled into children’s writing five-plus years ago, I was struck by the sense of community shared by nearly all of the folks involved, but I’d never sensed that more than at that moment Sunday afternoon. My heart felt full, and it was time to go home.

Labels: ,

Thursday, January 12, 2006

Is anybody goin' to San Antone?

I heard back from my agent today about my latest draft of James. She made a couple of editorial suggestions that seem so obvious that I'm a little embarrassed that I hadn't caught them myself.

Both suggestions feel like they should be fairly simple to address, but I suppose I'll find out for sure in the morning. I've got an idea for a new opening sentence, and I'll be curious to see how well it holds up after a night's sleep.

I'll get to meet my agent in person for the first time next week at the ALA Midwinter Meeting in San Antonio. Liz B at A Chair, A Fireplace and A Tea Cozy will be there, too, as will Don Tate. If you're reading this and plan to be there, please let me know -- I'd love to meet as many of you as possible.

Labels: , ,

Friday, December 09, 2005

Agented

As soon as the paperwork arrives, I'll be signing with literary agent Erin Murphy.

This may bode ill for her judgment, but at the moment, words fail me. I'm very, very excited. I'm ecstatic. I'm some combination of "excited" and "ecstatic" that doesn't even have a name because it would be completely redundant with "excited" and "ecstatic."

And I'm grateful. The past three weeks -- since I first heard back from Erin about the manuscripts I sent in September -- have just been fantastic. A big reason for that is the generosity of a dozen of Erin's clients who took the time to fill me in on their experiences with her. I kept waiting for at least one of them to inspire some sliver of doubt about whether I ought to be working with Erin.

It never happened.

So, I'd like to thank them for the complete confidence I feel in the decision I've made. And I'm also thankful for the handful of agented Austin friends who helped me make sure I was asking all the right questions.

A special thanks goes to my wife, who has listened to me talk about another woman for the better part of a month and yet shares utterly in my enthusiasm.

I've said a lot about why I want an agent. It's obviously a topic I've enjoyed. But I'm thrilled to be moving on now. Time to get back to writing.

Labels:

Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Further on up the road

So why all the e-mailing and phone calling lately? Part of the reason is my research on James, but it's mostly due to my discussions with the agent.

Things have progressed farther than with any other agent I've been in touch with, to the point of me contacting several of her clients. It's been as illuminating as it has been time-consuming.

I most likely won't post any more on this topic until the process plays itself out, but I will probably have a lot to say once things are resolved, one way or the other. So, if you've got any questions -- like I did, and to some extent still have -- about the process of finding an agent, feel free to ask them in the comments or e-mail them to me at the contact address on the main page of Bartography, and I'll answer as much as I can when the time is right.

Labels: ,

Friday, November 25, 2005

Coming into focus

This past week I've been thinking a lot about the agent's advice that I focus for a while on nonfiction. Specifically, I've pondered what my day-to-day writing life might be like if I applied that sort of focus.

I like what I've come up with. Besides the obvious -- my nonfiction projects would take top priority, and with The Day-Glo Brothers off my hands I'd need to think seriously about delving into a new research topic -- I've identified lots of little differences that might result.

Here are three that come to mind:
  • I've always got a to-read list (or three or four) of children's books, and they're all over the map -- picture books, middle grade, YA, plus nonfiction in all three categories. If I were to concentrate on that last group, and really get to know well the work of Russell Freedman, Susan Campbell Bartoletti, James Cross Giblin, Jim Murphy, etc., how might my own work benefit?
  • My long and growing list of regular blog reads reflects my lack of specialization, and it's eating my writing time alive. I can't imagine reading only nonfiction-related blogs, but I sure could better organize my blog reading so that those more pertinent to my focus get more attention more often.
  • Several months ago I subscribed to several children's literature e-mail lists. They still arrive by the boatload, but now I don't read a single one. What am I missing? If I don't find a way to pare away what's not relevant, I'll never know. But if I were to filter out those that don't discuss nonfiction, I might find something really worthwhile in what remains.
When I first received that agent's advice, I expected to buck and chafe at the mere notion of focusing on one genre of writing, even if it was just for the time being. But the more I think about it, the more sense it makes, and the more right it feels.

If that changes, I'll say so here.

Labels:

Friday, November 18, 2005

Good question

Last night my wife and I were discussing some wonderfully detailed feedback I had just received from an agent. This agent suggested that -- between my nonfiction and my picture book manuscripts and the middle-grade novels I want to write -- I might be just a bit too unfocused for this stage in my career.

Me: I just don't want to get pigeonholed as "nonfiction."

My wife: Why don't you get pigeonholed as "published"?

Labels:

Sunday, October 30, 2005

The sweet smell of rejection

I received a rejection letter from an agent yesterday, and it was notable for a couple of reasons.

First, it was long and detailed. Not just, "Sorry, not right for us," but a full page of personalized feedback, both praise ("We were all particularly impressed by...") and the opposite ("we worry... we felt they lacked... we also had some concerns..."). Good stuff, even if not quite the sort of stuff I'd been hoping for.

The second thing was -- and my wife confirmed this for me -- the letter smelled. It was scented. Perfumed, I tell you. Not as strong as the cologne strip in a magazine ad, but definitely noticeable.

Maybe all of this agent's correspondence -- or everything from her entire agency -- carries this aroma with it. Maybe just the rejections do, to make them go down more easily. Or maybe there's a hierarchy of smells available to them for marking their letters, and I got one of the more appealing ones.

If that's the case, I'm just glad I didn't submit to this agent a few revisions back...

Labels:

Friday, September 30, 2005

And now, the thrilling conclusion to "Why I Want an Agent" week

I've been trying to lead up to something, and it's this: for me, in my circumstances, I believe that

The right literary agent can help
me become a better writer

I don't expect that having an agent will automatically make me write better (I'd give 20% for that), but I do think that the right one can help create opportunities in which I can realize more of my potential.

It's not just that offloading my manuscript-peddling duties would free up more time for me to write, though that's part of it. Mostly this crackpot theory of mine stems from my revisions of The Day-Glo Brothers. Through that process, I've learned a lot from my editor, and in a thoroughly enjoyable way I've been pushed and challenged to make good writing better.

What I want in an agent is someone who can make it possible for me to work with more editors in that same way, and frequently. I want an agent who can encourage -- and, more to the point, sell -- the wide variety of work that I'd like to do. I think that that variety makes me sharper, and I know it makes me happy.

So, that's it, then. That's what I'll put in my queries: I'm looking for an agent who will make me happy. Who could pass up that opportunity?

Labels:

Thursday, September 29, 2005

"Why I Want an Agent" Week, Part IV

Because I want to have books published more
than just once every two or three years

Maybe things are moving at a faster pace than that for me already. Maybe they aren't. With only one book under contract so far, there's really no way to tell. But I do know that the one-year anniversary of my first contract offer is nearly here, and I'd hoped to have a second contract already.

Now, I could still be writing 50 years from now, and a book every two or three years over a half-century span comes out to quite a few books in the end. So why am I sweating over the prospect of not averaging a book a year? Part of it's psychological, I'm sure -- my dad died at 39, so I know firsthand that life is not always as long as it should be.

The main reason, though, is that I've got a lot of ideas that I want to pursue for fiction, non-fiction, picture books, middle-grade, etc. (This wasn't always the case. I spent my 20s wondering, "What should I write about?") If my track record is any indication, many of those ideas will turn out to be duds.

But I want to have the opportunity to at least give them a try, and without an agent to take on the job of selling the ones that do work, I just don't know that I'll have the time to get to them all. And that bugs me.

(Besides, I've seen how things can move faster when an agent is involved -- e.g. manuscript gets e-mailed from agent to editor on Friday afternoon, editor gives agent an answer Monday morning. I am not a patient person, so having someone on my side who can suss out an editor's interest that quickly has a lot of appeal to me.)

Plus, I love the gratification of sharing my work with other people. It's a big motivator for me. So I wonder how inspired I would be to keep pursuing all my ideas if the ones that get published are relatively few and far between.

Next: The thrilling conclusion

Labels:

Wednesday, September 28, 2005

"Why I Want an Agent" Week, Part III

100% of a dollar is nice, but 85% of $1.20 is even better
I harbor no delusions (well, not many) of being able to turn my writing into my primary career anytime soon, but I do like the idea of making some money at it.

And while I'm proud of the way I handled myself when negotiating my first contract (the folks at my publisher are welcome to laugh up their sleeves like Heck Jones, but it's true), I figure that a good agent could have made the deal 20% sweeter by pulling various levers that are beyond my grasp just yet.

What's more, for the moment I'm just talking about a contract-by-contract comparison -- for any single contract I could get on my own, this Good Agent of my dreams could make that contract more lucrative for me while saving me time on things like maintaining my publishers database.

I'll take it. No arm-twisting required.

Next: Because I want to have books published more than just once every two or three years

Labels:

Tuesday, September 27, 2005

"Why I Want an Agent" Week, Part II

It's about the time, not the money
I used to not want to part with 15% of my earnings as a writer. Now, my attitude has shifted slightly, to "Take it! Please, please, please, just TAKE IT!!!"

That's because I can spare 15%. What I can't spare is time. It's all accounted for, thank you. Between researching, writing, revising, manuscript critiques, Austin SCBWI activities, and, of course, blogging -- not to mention all those elements of my non-writing life: my family, my salaried job, my commute, sleeping, exercising, cheese enchiladas -- making time for submissions and all that they involve has become nigh on impossible.

A good agent who can give me back a little of my time in exchange for a 15% cut sounds like a better deal every day.

Next: 100% of a dollar is nice, but 85% of $1.20 is even better

Labels:

Sunday, September 25, 2005

"Why I Want an Agent" Week, Part I

Last week's comment by Pam and my own recent exchanges with literary agents have got me to thinking.

The question I used to ask myself about agents was "Do I want one?" That's now easy for me to answer -- yes. The question that's replaced it -- "Why do I want one?" -- is trickier, but this week I'm going to try my best to answer it. Tonight's installment is:


My publishers database is both overgrown and underfed
I used to pride myself on the database I'd set up for keeping track of publishers, the editors who work there, the books they've produced, etc. As these things go, I thought it was pretty comprehensive, well organized, and useful.

Now, it just strikes me as a necessary evil, drudgery, and something I'd dearly love to not have to keep up with anymore. When I take a look at the file, my lack of enthusiasm shows. Here's a sample:
Ms. Jamie Michalak Associate Editor at 2002 SCBWI Spring Thing -- SHE'S GONE (PC 7/04); xxxxxxxxx@candlewick.com; 10 others listed; sent Day-Glo MS to Hilary Cameron; Executive Editor Mary Lee Donovan (CW 8/02); Sarah Ketchersid, Editor, coming to Austin 10/04; Deborah Wayshak, editor of PB and YA (also a writer of YA fantasies; likes picture books with longer texts and more sophisticated plots, says xxxxxxxx after DFW conference 9/04); Marc Aronson is buying young-adult novels, PW 7/8/04; Monica Perez has left for Houghton, PC 5.05
Clearly, some pruning is in order. But the problem is not just that I need to clear out some old contact names. What I notice most is the limited usefulness of this document. I have information that might help me get a manuscript to a receptive editor, but all the database fields in the world won't allow me to know these people the way a good agent knows them.

Keeping this database helped me learn the business a few years back. Now, I've learned it well enough to know that there are limits on the insight I'll be able to glean from Publisher's Weekly, the Purple Crayon, and the occasional conference. And so I'm looking for an agent who inhabits the same world as the editors I want to read my manuscripts, and who can help me retire from the publishers-database business.

Next: It's about the time, not the money

Labels:

Wednesday, September 21, 2005

Other than Martha and Rita, a pretty good day

Bleah. I just finished watching the children's-book-contest episode of The Apprentice: Martha Stewart. What a grim, unpleasant way to spend the hour. The folks at Random House came off all right -- Anne Schwartz smartly seized the opportunity to pooh-pooh the sing-songy rhyme used in the losing team's effort (and in so many celebrity-written books, though she didn't say so) -- but I really don't see how the publisher benefits by being involved in such tawdry proceedings.

It is possible, though, that I underestimate the book-buying public's hunger for an aquatic retelling of Jack and the Beanstalk written by an eight-member collective going by the name "Primarius" and illustrated by... by...

Uh, well, they didn't say. Thanks, Madonna.

In far better news today, I received an e-mail from the agent I'd corresponded with last week. It was just a quick note to tell me that she'd received the package of manuscripts I'd sent her. What a gracious thing for her to do. And completely out of the ordinary, in my experience. You have no idea how many points that earned her in my book. And it took, what, a minute of her time? Two minutes? Why is that sort of gesture so uncommon in this business?

Meanwhile, there was more to do with The Day-Glo Brothers, including a lunchtime phone interview with a source for the second time in as many days. (Didn't I say that "finished" is a relative term?) For a while, I was unnerved that one source was referring to something as a type of fabric and another was referring to it as a resinous material (yes, we are getting this nitpicky), but then I realized that they're both talking about cellulose acetate. It's a fabric, it's a resin, it's a plastic, and so much more!

Oh, and there's a Category 5 hurricane barreling toward the Texas coast, with vast amounts of wetness expected to reach up here to us in Austin on Saturday. In the meantime, it's supposed to be 101 degrees tomorrow. Happy autumn, y'all.

Labels:

Tuesday, September 13, 2005

Lame moves and missing e-mails

For a while I've thought that one of the lamest moves a writer -- or anyone -- can make is to send a follow-up e-mail to "make sure" someone (an editor, for example) received a previous letter or e-mail. It's a move that carries a whiff of desperation: "If they didn't respond to that one, maybe they'll respond to this one."

Yesterday, I sent just such an e-mail (cloaked as an "update"), and boy, am I glad I did. In mid-May I'd queried an agent regarding various of my manuscripts -- six or seven in all -- and as the months passed, I stewed over the lack of response. I'd mailed the query, along with a synopsis and chapter outline for my novel, but I deliberately did not send an SASE, so as to encourage a response via e-mail. Finally, yesterday, quite suddenly, I decided it was time to follow up.

By mid-day, I'd heard back from this agent. Not only had she received my query, etc., but she had already replied. She'd replied in mid-June with an e-mail -- just as I'd hoped -- inviting me to send her every manuscript I'd mentioned in my query. For whatever reason, I never got that e-mail.

And it's not as if it's the first time this has happened. A couple of years ago, I'd e-mailed a Big-Name Editor with a picture book biography manuscript (not The Day-Glo Brothers), on the recommendation of one of her published authors. Months went by, and I heard nothing. Finally, I went for the "just making sure" gambit and heard quickly from this Big-Name Editor that she'd mailed a request for a rewrite -- along with two recently published picture-book biographies to serve as guideposts -- a few months earlier. Her package had never arrived.

In that case, the Big-Name Editor resent the books, I rewrote my manuscript three times, and in the end, nothing came of our efforts. But the relationship and the improved manuscript that resulted from my following up on that original e-mail sure made up for any self-perceived lameness for following up.

The other day Jane Yolen touched on the frustration of not having other professionals in this business reply to calls, letters, and e-mails in a timely fashion. It's worth remembering that the postal service or its online and even voice-mail equivalents may possibly be at fault, and that any editor or agent who would spurn you just because you followed up on a previous missive is probably not someone you'd want to work with, anyway.

Labels: